“It is generally supposed, and not least by Catholics, that the Catholic who writes fiction is out to use fiction to prove the truth of the Faith, or at the least, to prove the existence of the supernatural. He may be. No one certainly can be sure of his low motives except as they suggest themselves in his finished work, but when the finished work suggests that pertinent actions have been fraudulently manipulated or overlooked or smothered, whatever purposes the writer started out with have already been defeated. What the fiction writer will discover, if he discovers anything at all, is that he himself cannot move or mold reality in the interests of an abstract truth. The writer learns, perhaps more quickly than the reader, to be humble in the face of what-is. What-is is all he has to do with; the concrete is his medium; and he will realize eventually that fiction can transcend its limitations only by staying within them.”
Flannery O'Connor“For me it is the virgin birth, the Incarnation, the resurrection which are the true laws of the flesh and the physical. Death, decay, destruction are the suspension of these laws. I am always astonished at the emphasis the Church puts on the body. It is not the soul she says that will rise but the body, glorified.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“There won't be any biographies of me, for only one reason, lives spent between the house and the chicken farm do not make for exciting copy.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“Smugness is the Great Catholic Sin.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“[W]hat one has as a born Catholic is something given and accepted before it is experienced. I am only slowly coming to experience things that I have all along accepted. I suppose the fullest writing comes from what has been accepted and experienced both and that I have just not got that far yet all the time. Conviction without experience makes for harshness.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“Our spiritual character is formed as much by what we endure and what is taken from us as it is by our achievements and our conscious choices.”
Flannery O'Connor, Flannery O'Connor: Spiritual Writings“I don’t really think the standard of judgment, the missing link, you spoke of that you find in my stories emerges from any religion but Christianity, because it concerns specifically Christ and the Incarnation, the fact that there has been a unique intervention in history. It’s not a matter in these stories of Do Unto Others. That can be found in any ethical cultural series. It is the fact of the Word made flesh.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“Lord, I believe; help my unbelief'... is the most natural and most human and most agonizing prayer in the gospels, and I think it is the foundation prayer of faith.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“I do not like the raw sound of the human voice in unison unless it is under the discipline of music.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“Dogma is the guardian of mystery. The doctrines are spiritually significant in ways that we cannot fathom.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor“The meaning of a story should go on expanding for the reader the more he thinks about it, but meaning cannot be captured in an interpretation. If teachers are in the habit of approaching a story as if it were a research problem for which any answer is believable so long as it is not obvious, then I think students will never learn to enjoy fiction. Too much interpretation is certainly worse than too little, and where feeling for a story is absent, theory will not supply it.”
Flannery O'Connor, The Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O'Connor